The Crazy, Right-Wing Shooter Myth | RealClearPolitics
If you only read the New York Times editorials, you d believe that political violence in America is a right-wing problem. The Times has been warning of violence from the right for years, but on Nov. 19 and 26, they wrote two long editorials making these claims. The violence stems from the lies enthusiastically spread by Republican politicians. Democrats only complicity was their $53 million in spending on far-right fringe candidates in the primaries. The fringe candidates, it was hoped, would be easier to beat in the general election.
Both editorials mention the mass murderer in Buffalo, New York, as a political right-winger. But they have been doing that all year. In May, the Times claimed he was of the right because he was racist and listened to a video on a site known for hosting right-wing extremism. The headline in the Times announced: Replacement theory, espoused by the suspect in the Buffalo massacre, has been embraced by some right-wing politicians and commentators.
You wouldn t know it from reading the Times, but the Buffalo killer was yet another mass murderer motivated by environmentalism.
In his manifesto, the Buffalo mass murderer self-identifies as an eco-fascist national socialist and a member of the mild-moderate authoritarian left. He expresses concern that minority immigrants have too many children and will damage the environment. The invaders are the ones overpopulating the world, he writes. Kill the invaders, kill the overpopulation and by doing so save the environment.
John Lott.