Pride Is The Flag Of American Occupation
The pride flag is not merely a symbol of sexual license. It is also a symbol for using identity politics to erase the original U.S. Constitution.
That is clear because the pride legal agenda includes erasing key constitutional protections that are meant to apply to all equally, meaning without regard to private sexual behavior. It requires enforcement by a bureaucracy that in its very existence violates the constitutional division of powers between legislative, judicial, and executive. Uniting these, Father of the Constitution James Madison said, is tyranny.
The legal, activist, and cultural entities forwarding the pride agenda seek nothing less than the erasure of free speech, freedom of association, freedom of the press, republican checks and balances, the nuclear family, the parent-child bond, the marital bond, and legal protections for minors based on their incapacity for self-governance. This is clear from their legislative activity, which includes hate speech laws that gag people from speaking about their ideas even in private, and stripping kids from their parents protection.
Very quickly displacing homosexuals, the current tip of this spear is the transgender movement. Before that, it was the other identity politics groups: every ancestry except for European, and what seems like forever ago feminism. Who knows what next entity will be used to groom Americans into accepting the further erasure of our natural rights; perhaps it s furries.
The pride flag is now the flag of identity politics. The version the White House flew expresses this directly, with the additional stripes representing every ethnicity except one. Identity politics is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution. Enshrining it in American law is in fact a tacit regime change.
Is Pride the flag of regime change in the US? Interesting suggestion. Something is going on, that’s for sure. And something pretty bad. Anything that involves “the erasure of free speech, freedom of association,” and so on, is on my bad list. I honestly don’t know how to characterize it; it falls outside of what always seemed to me normal politics. We haven’t seen anything like the end of it, either.