Are the Gospels Mythical? by Rene Girard | Articles | First Things
From the earliest days of Christianity, the Gospels resemblance to certain myths has been used as an argument against Christian faith. When pagan apologists for the official pantheism of the Roman empire denied that the death-and-resurrection myth of Jesus differed in any significant way from the myths of Dionysus, Osiris, Adonis, Attis, etc., they failed to stem the rising Christian tide. In the last two hundred years, however, as anthropologists have discovered all over the world foundational myths that similarly resemble Jesus s Passion and Resurrection, the notion of Christianity as a myth seems at last to have taken hold even among Christian believers.
Beginning with some violent cosmic or social crisis, and culminating in the suffering of a mysterious victim (often at the hands of a furious mob), all these myths conclude with the triumphal return of the sufferer, thereby revealed as a divinity. The kind of anthropological research undertaken before World War II in which theorists struggled to account for resemblances among myths is regarded as a hopeless metaphysical failure by most anthropologists nowadays. Its failure seems, however, not to have weakened anthropology s skeptical scientific spirit, but only to have weakened further, in some mysterious way, the plausibility of the dogmatic claims of religion that the earlier theorists had hoped to supersede: if science itself cannot formulate universal truths of human nature, then religion as manifestly inferior to science must be even more devalued than we had supposed.
This is the contemporary intellectual situation Christian thinkers face as they read the Scriptures. The Cross is incomparable insofar as its victim is the Son of God, but in every other respect it is a human event. An analysis of that event exploring the anthropological aspects of the Passion that we cannot neglect if we take the dogma of the Incarnation seriously not only reveals the falsity of contemporary anthropology s skepticism about human nature. It also utterly discredits the notion that Christianity is in any sense mythological. The world s myths do not reveal a way to interpret the Gospels, but exactly the reverse: the Gospels reveal to us the way to interpret myth.
A classic magazine essay from 1996. Rene Girard has always seemed one of those inaccessible French intellectuals, interesting but obscure. Both are evident here. But Girard is far more intelligible than many of his contemporaries and his analysis of mimesis is insightful and disturbing. He has influenced the likes of Peter Thiel and J.D. Vance FWIW.