Paul Sperry: “Dam Is Starting To Break On The Bad Guys Who Did This To The Country” | Video | RealClearPolitics
VINCE COGLIANESE: Yes, so the left is claiming that what Tulsi Gabbard has released is is old news. There’s nothing to see here. It doesn’t implicate Obama or John Brennan in anything at all.
How do you view it?
PAUL SPERRY: Well, not at all. They’re ignoring the key piece that’s two things, actually three things. What one we found out that the they put the dossier in the main body of the intelligence community assessment that Obama ordered after Trump’s surprise victory over Hillary.
They were all shocked and needed to do something. To derail him. And so they came up with this intelligence, cooked it up and laundered Hillary’s political dirt in the form of this dossier and incorporated it into the actual analysis in the main body of the text of the classified version of the ICA.
And, you know, they didn’t even disclose that they had included an annex, a summary of the dossier that came out in 2020. But now we knew that. But now we now we know that, no, there was actually a bullet point supporting the most controversial conclusion that they had in the ICA, which was that Putin had aspired to, you know, intervene into in the election directly, personally to help Trump beat Hillary.
OK, so that that was the most radioactive conclusion they had. And it obviously wasn’t supported enough with what they had in terms of other intelligence. So they added the dossier to back it up in one of the four bullet points that they had in the in the text.
And they’re all ignoring this when they go on TV. Now, I notice that Michael Isikoff was on last night and he was debating Matt Taibbi. And he says, no, you know, all he did was they put this in an annex, the dossier.
B.S. Either he didn’t read the documents that are being declassified or he’s just being intellectually dishonest. He knows that now we know that it was actually as a supporting bullet point in the main text. And that’s just hugely scandalous new information.
The other thing we found out is that they changed the the level of confidence they had, reversed it from low confidence in that conclusion to high confidence before and after the election, after Trump won, which is very convenient. And then the other thing is they’ve got whistleblowers now that worked on this project who are coming out of the woodwork, as DNI Gabbard said. And they had one that’s showing up in the document dump that you put out, 114 pages, who was saying that he was pressured by his superiors to stay quiet because he had worked on the pre-election intelligence that said, no, we don’t have any confidence that Putin did this.
And he was pressured to change that conclusion. And then when he protested, he dissented. Then they took him off the thing and they kept telling him, listen, we have we have intelligence that but they wouldn’t let him see it.
And they said, just trust us.