Facebook ‘fact checkers’ foul again after censoring Post story

How, exactly, did Facebook determine that Mosher s reasoned arguments constituted False information ? Well, in fact, it didn t so determine: Rather, it was an independent fact-checker.

And who did this fact checker rely on for their opinion? As reporter Sharyl Attkisson notes, one expert consulted had a clear conflict of interest: She has regularly worked with Wuhan s researchers, and even done her own experiments there. Danielle E. Anderson, assistant professor, Duke-NUS Medical School in Singapore, personally attested to the lab s strict control and containment measures.

via nypost.com

It’s almost like Facebook automatically takes the side of the CCP. Why would they do that? How is it in Facebook’s commercial interest? I mean, the CCP isn’t in favor of capitalism, are they? Well, not regular capitalism. Not unless you’re talking about some sort of corrupt crony set up where they and their friends get rich and everyone else is just their slaves. That’s not like Facebook, is it? Wait a second; now I’m confused.