18 Year Term Limit for Supreme Court Justices – Yang2020 – Andrew Yang for President

Our Founding Fathers intended the judicial branch of government to be free of political pressures, interpreting and applying the Constitution to the laws passed by Congress in order to ensure that no violations were found.

Today, the Supreme Court is increasingly polarized around political lines, and the selection of a new Justice is a bitter fight that divides the country. The process has become increasingly contentious, and very few Americans believe that the Supreme Court is impartial. 

The first step in ensuring that the Supreme Court doesn t lose the faith of the American people is to establish a clear code of ethics that applies to the Justices. Currently, all inferior courts have a Code of Ethics applied to them, and violations can be litigated. However, as the Supreme Court of the land, there s no applicable Code that applies to its members.

Congress has put a few requirements on Justices – recusement requirements and financial disclosure requirements – that the Justices have abided by. It s time that a full Code of Ethics is established, ensuring that people know our Supreme Court Justices are acting ethically.

Additionally, the stakes involved in the appointment of Supreme Court justices are creating partisan battles that divide our country, create bitter resentment, and allow individuals to delegitimize later decisions with which they disagree.

The stats largely back up that we do have a partisan problem on the Supreme Court. The number of 5-4 decisions, reflecting the line between Republican-appointed and Democrat-appointed Justices, has increased in recent years. When a new seat opens up, lifetime appointments incentivize finding the youngest, most partisan jurist who can gain confirmation in order to ensure a particular bent on the Court for as long as possible. Current Justices can expect to serve for 40 or more years. For historical context, the average Justice has served for 15 years, though Justices appointed since 1970 have served for an average of 26 years.

This isn t the way it was envisioned at the founding of our country, when life expectancy was shorter and Justices would often retire or resign well ahead of their deaths. We need to return some level of sanity and balance to the Supreme Court.

The answer to this is to impose term limits on Justices, and set their terms at regular intervals. Each President should be allowed to appoint two Justices per term served, in their first and third years in office.

via www.yang2020.com

This notion of Andrew Yang’s strikes me as a good idea. Implementation would be complicated but the basic idea seems good.

Andrew’s other signature idea, universal basic income, is at this time, the worst idea ever, and possibly would lead us to hyperinflation, without a lot of modification, which could make it even worse, but different, such as imposing it through some sort of Federal digital currency, which in turn would lead us to a social credit system. Which would be awful. But that’s a different story. I say, under current circumstances, because we’re on like our n-th round of credit card refinancings of our out-the-wazoo debt. If we were flush, who knows, UBI might be a good idea, but we are very far from that.

I personally think we have stepped off the slippery slope to Argentina and part of me is just in denial of that fact. Sigh.